Sponsored Post[?]
DxO OpticsPro 11 Released
By PhotoJoseph
June 1, 2016 - 9:00pm
DxO OpticsPro 11 was released today, and as before I was contracted to make some videos for their shiny new product. Check 'em out below, and click here to learn more about DxO Optics Pro 11 (where you can also download a free trial).
More like this
- Tip
- Tip
- Tip
- Tip
- Tip
Comments
on June 2, 2016 - 3:00am
It´s a nice piece of software, but $200 (or $150) for a raw processor that doesn’t support one of the major camera brands out there, come on! It’s quite embarrassing, i think.
on June 2, 2016 - 7:35pm
What major camera brand isn't supported?
@PhotoJoseph
— Have you signed up for the mailing list?
on June 2, 2016 - 11:04pm
fujifilm.
on June 3, 2016 - 12:51am
It looks like at least some Fujifilm cameras are supported… this is from http://www.dxo.com/us/photography/photo-software/dxo-opticspro/supported…
@PhotoJoseph
— Have you signed up for the mailing list?
on June 3, 2016 - 1:15am
yes, some, but none of the x series. maybe in the future, i hope :)
on June 3, 2016 - 8:35pm
Hi wilsonmg, we do get questions from Fuji fans about why we don’t support the X-series cameras, and if you’re curious, here’s why: http://dxo.io/fuji-x
Basically, it boils down to the physics of the sensor. Of course, if this changes in the future we’ll be sure to make a big announcement about it.
Thanks for understanding and we sincerely appreciate the passion of fellow photographers and the questions we receive!
on June 6, 2016 - 7:21pm
thanks for your input.
on June 2, 2016 - 4:15am
Not embarrassing at all. OP 10 does a better job of extracting detail, correcting lens aberrations, and reducing noise than any other RAW processor I’ve tried (including C1 Pro, LR and Aperture), and it does so with less user intervention. For my high-volume event photography, it’s proven a worthwhile investment.
www.jacquescornell.photography
on June 2, 2016 - 11:13pm
the software is awesome, no doubt. if you have the right camera brand/model. but no support for fujifilm in 2016, it’s strange. i think they are throwing away a lot of potential customers. but it’s their decision and i respect it.
on June 14, 2016 - 6:49am
I found the OP edge slightly true with OP10 and C1 8. Took a little more work to get C1 there and OP10 was easier at it though it was slower and DAM capabilities are limited.
On trying out OP11 (and ready for the modest upgrade cost with credit card card in hand) I had to pause. In my situation, C1 9 looked better. Not expecting that result, I took a couple more tries at it. Nope. I think C1 9 stepped up the game a bit and it could be that the early release of OP has some stuff to tweak on my camera combo before it settles in. I'm an Oly shooter and sometimes what works great for Canon and Nikon isn't the same for Oly. C1 9 also supported more of my lenses and the keystone tool is better than the Perspective plug in.
But where I really need OP11 features is with my drone scenery. I'd love to use those tools on my DJI shots but OP doesn't support my DJI raw files.
on June 5, 2016 - 5:52am
Gee, Wilson, maybe you oughta write to Fuji about working with devs instead of making them reverse-engineer everything.
www.jacquescornell.photography
on June 11, 2016 - 8:28pm
I am currently using DxO Optics Pro 8.. I love the software for it’s great lens correction and fast editing capabilities.. 1 thing I really miss is a watermarking feature to allow batch watermarking of selected images on processing… Has this been addressed in this version?
SKR Imaging
https://skrimaging.wordpress.com
on June 13, 2016 - 10:00pm
Not that I've seen, sorry.
@PhotoJoseph
— Have you signed up for the mailing list?